مشخصات کاربر
 - نام کاربر : mohammad m
- تاریخ عضویت : 1390/10/7
- تعداد نظرهای داده شده : 3
نظرها
موارد 1 تا 3 از مجموع 3 مورد
موارد 1 تا 3 از مجموع 3 مورد
- نگاه ویدئویی به پنج ویژگی مشترک در نسل جدید گوشیهای پرچمدار
- معرفی Redmi A4 5G – پایینرده 100 دلاری با نمایشگر 6.88 اینچی، SD 4s Gen 2 و باتری 5,160mAh
- معرفی ZTE Blade V70 – میانردهای با السیدی +HD و دوربین 108 مگاپیکسلی
- معرفی خانواده ROG Phone 9 – گیمینگ فونهای ایسوس با اسنپدراگون 8 الیت و نمایشگر 185 هرتزی
- نگاهی به HyperOS 2 به همراه جدول زمانی و فهرست دیوایسهای قابل ارتقاء به این پوسته
- نگاهی به فناوری ISOCELL ALoP – راهکار سامسونگ برای کاهش برآمدگی دوربینهای بخش پشتی گوشی
- شیائومی 14T Pro در نگاه رسانهها – نقاط ضعف و قوت از دید حرفهایها
Samsung I9100 Galaxy S II
نهایتا اگر کسی نو گیر اورد به من هم بگه
Samsung I9100 Galaxy S II
Many of you, may have got I9100G, recently, as it is the new stock available. Samsung is trying to replace the original SII, i.e. I9100 with I9100G, in the markets of INDIA, MALAYSIA & SINGAPORE.
This is to fulfill the demands of GALAXY SII, which has increased vastly. So, to fulfill the demand, before it dies out, SAMSUNG has quietly slipped I9100G version, which has PowerVR TI OMAP 4430 processor, and not the Exynos 4210.
So, what i have researched and found out is that, it is better, if you can get an I9100, before it extincts, instead of getting stuck with "G".
By no means, i am saying that, I9100G, is bad, what i am trying to say here is that, its not as good as I9100's Exynos.
Some major differences which i found out are:-
1. Galaxy SII I9100 will be the first in the GALAXY family, to get an ICS update.
2. Exynos processors still have huge RAW power.
3. The isuue is GPU used in I9100G has PowerVR540 TI OMAP 4430, at 300 MHz,which is single core and weak, compared to MALI400MP+, which is quadcore inside Exynos.
******I am talking about GPU, and not single or dual core CPU******
4. Regarding future updates, I9100G users may be isolated, as I9100G is not replacing original I9100 in EU, and so many other countries.
5. Also, the development support for I9100, is much much much greater than I9100G. As majority of the community still uses I9100.
6. The overheating problem is very less in I9100G, as compared to I9100.
7. Battery, too performs well in I9100G.
8. But, both overheating, and battery improvement, doesn't comes without cost. I9100G doesn't gets overheated, because its cpu is clocked max at 1.008 Ghz, unlike 1.2Ghz in I9100. Same, helps with improved battery.
Well, these were the major issues which i pointed out.
Also, here i am just trying to convey knowledge, which i gained to others.I have not posted this to decide whats superior, its just a comaprison.
Any Opinions, or views is warmly welcomed.
Samsung I9100 Galaxy S II